Wednesday, July 17, 2019
English Proficiency Conclusion
Conclusions On the basis of the findings of the study, the following conclusions were  haggard 1. A great majority of the  replyents  atomic number 18  phallic, graduates of  normal high schools, and pursuing the degree program  bachelor-at-arms of Science in Civil Engineering (BSCE). 2. When the respondents argon grouped  check to the  shifting gender, their  general  direct of technique in the four  side of meat grammar skills is  seriously Proficient.When they  atomic number 18 grouped according to the variable  vitrine of high school attended, their overall level of proficiency in the four English grammar skills is Poorly Proficient. When the respondents are grouped according to the variable degree program, their overall level of proficiency in the four English grammar skills is Poorly Proficient. 3. The respondents do not   take issue importantly in their skills in  inquire questions and in responding to questions when they are grouped according to the variable gender.In other w   ords, the male respondents  index to ask questions and to respond to questions does not differ from that of the female respondents ability to  do the same grammar skills. On the other hand, the respondents differ significantly in their skills in combining sentences and in  rarifying sentences when they are grouped according to the variable gender. That is, the male respondents ability to combine sentences and to expand sentences differs from that of the female respondents ability to perform said grammar skills.As to the variable type of high school attended, the respondents do not differ significantly in their skills in asking questions, in responding to questions, in combining sentences, and in expanding sentences. That is, the  backstage high school graduates ability to ask questions, to respond to questions, to combine sentences, and to expand sentences do not differ from that of the public high school graduates ability to perform said grammar skills.When the respondents are grou   ped according to their  various(prenominal) degree programs/sections, they differ significantly in their skills in asking questions, in combining sentences, and in expanding sentences  save there is no significant difference in their skills in responding to questions. In other words, the respondents from each of the  threesome sections differ from each other in their ability to perform said grammar skills.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.